[e.g., "Sizing non-recourse debt for a merchant-exposed wind farm"]
[one line: the leverage-vs-downside tension on a partly-merchant revenue stack]
![[e.g., "Sizing non-recourse debt for a merchant-exposed wind farm"]](/__l5e/assets-v1/5eb6d4d3-9e05-4ee7-8510-b3752dd42b8a/wind-hero-v2.jpg)
01
Project Snapshot
- Asset
- [onshore wind]
- Capacity
- [e.g., 200 MW]
- Market
- [e.g., ERCOT]
- Revenue
- [e.g., 70% hedged / 30% merchant]
- Tax credit
- PTC
- Debt tenor
- [e.g., 18 yrs]
02
The Challenge
[How to size sculpted debt against P50 vs P99 production and a hedged/merchant revenue mix while holding DSCR and LLCR — maximizing leverage without breaking coverage in the downside.]
03
The Approach
- 01
[Build P50 and P99 production cases]
- 02
[Layer hedged vs merchant revenue]
- 03
[Monetize the PTC]
- 04
[Sculpt debt to a target DSCR]
- 05
[Test LLCR; set cash sweeps and reserves]
04
Inside the Model
[Describe the sculpted-debt engine and coverage outputs.]
[ Image placeholder — Sculpted debt profile + DSCR/LLCR over time ]
05
Results at a Glance
[Min DSCR][Avg DSCR][LLCR][Gearing %][Sponsor IRR]
06
What This Demonstrates
- Debt sizing & sculpting
- P50/P99 production sizing
- Merchant/hedged revenue modeling
- PTC mechanics
- Covenant design
07
Key Takeaway
[Idea + mechanism, two sentences.]
Illustrative case built on representative data; not based on any confidential or client transaction.